Logo

Will ChatGPT make Quora obsolete?

Last Updated: 27.06.2025 17:16

Will ChatGPT make Quora obsolete?

This is what she replied with:

ChatGPT will not make Quora (or any other platform) obsolete.

In ancient kingdoms, viziers were senior advisors to the king or emperor. They handled state affairs, offered counsel, and executed the ruler’s directives, much like a modern-day chief of staff.

How do Greeks identify themselves in terms of civilization? Do they feel more connected to Western or Middle Eastern civilization and why?

That’s it. There isn’t much of a significant difference. Both superheroes work at the same creative level.

It’s by showing the symbiotic relationship we have with AI tools like ChatGPT. Tools like these cannot think for you. You have to do the thinking. Then communicate with these tools. Then the tools will behave like your assistants.

A sort of Meta-AI thing.

New Chemical Kills 95% of Termites and Can’t Harm Humans - SciTechDaily

As you will see, this crazy little idea would help her win this debate competition against 20 other teams (even though she had less than 12 hours to prepare) and will also answer your question. So stay with me.

Meta-X = X about X

I sent this PDF to my follower and asked her to use the same conclusion points to conclude her debate:

Murray State clinches first MCWS appearance, becomes fourth No. 4 seed to make it to Omaha - NCAA.com

Bruce Wayne (Batman) has a human moderator: Alfred.

So this answer was not written using AI.

I would never use AI to write a Quora answer. I’ve got a different kind of attachment with Quora. Quora was the first platform I started creating content on. I’ve got a special corner for the people on Quora who have been reading my answers.

Samsung could drop Google Gemini in favor of Perplexity for Galaxy S26 - Ars Technica

Or am I?

Calm down. It’s Sunny this side.

I totally disappeared from the face of Quora more than a year ago. And I reappear abruptly, out of thin air, talking about AI. Uncanny, isn’t it?

Why does a straight man like anal penetration?

Or is it?

Alfred supports Batman on a personal and ethical level, whereas Jarvis is more of a technical and operational assistant for Iron Man.

Before we proceed, you should be aware of the prefix Meta.

Renault CEO and architect of Alpine F1 project stepping down - The Race

I was already occupied with a lot of work, but I had this crazy little idea that made me throw away everything else and glue myself to this moment.

I collected every point I had discussed with her in Instagram DMs and fed those points to ChatGPT, asking it to lead them to a final conclusion. Furthermore, I asked it to create a PDF of the conclusion points and send it to me.

Meta-Learning = Learning about Learning

A doctor shares the 7 supplements he takes a day to reduce inflammation, prevent heart disease, and support metabolism - Business Insider

Alright.

Examples:

The other half? — It’s to counter the chess move put forward by the opponents.

Hello, I have a question about astral projection. I started to get interested in this a little while after my mum passed in april. I thought I may be able to see her and speak with her if I managed to achieve astral projection. Since this interest, every time i sleep on my back I go into sleep paralysis. However, I cant progress into astral projection because it is very scary for me as I feel like I'm suffocating when this happens. I panic and force myself to wake up. This only ever happened about once a year before this. It sometimes lasts a long time. This has happened about 3 times per week since my mum died, as mentioned on a previous post. I no longer try to go into it anymore(due to the suffocating feeling), but it still happens. I read that sleep paralysis is the pathway to astral projection. Why has this started to happen so frequently since simply taking an interest in it? Is this connected to the afterlife? I am concerned about it as I now cannot seem to stop this happening. Could it be my mum trying to communicate? Im asking due to more knowledge around this in this group.

Generative AI is just autocorrect on steroids. To put it simply, its main job is to predict the next word. That’s it. Although it does that thing so brilliantly that it helps us create stuff, there’s no way it would make Quora or any other creative platform or job obsolete. It’ll just reduce the labor work that doesn’t require creativity. So, if your job is pure labor and doesn’t require you to be creative, AI will probably make it obsolete. It’s always better to switch to being creative. Not only would it be engaging and healthy for your brain, but you also wouldn’t feel threatened to lose your job.

What if all of this is being written by an AI?

I can’t explain the joy that ran through my nerves seeing we were able to pull off such a heist.

I want to have anal sex, but my wife refuses. What do I do?

That’ll be done by bringing forth the historical term Amanuenses.

Or was it?

The next day, I received her text:

All of the new features coming to Apple’s iOS apps - TechCrunch

But how does this meta-fication prove our point?

A couple of months ago, I received these texts from one of my followers on Instagram:

Another great historical reference would be that of Viziers.

Why am I attracted to older men?

So, I asked her to roughly formulate what the potential moves of her opponents might be.

To achieve feats that are greater than us, we need a greater level of assistance.

Is this AI as Sunny? Or Sunny as AI? Or just AI?

Did the Brits ever carry out high-profile, high-risk missions in World War II like the Americans did with a U-110 in the fictional movie “U-571”?

Meta-Joke = A Joke about Jokes

Even if the greatest novel writers didn’t have ChatGPT back then, they did have somebody special around them who sparked ideas like a catalyst in a chemical reaction. But today, we don’t need to rely on another human for that. We can rely on Generative AI.

Well… now we’ve put forth our chess move. That’s half of what it takes to win a debate.

Amanuenses: Many famous writers employed assistants responsible for taking dictation or copying manuscripts. For example, John Milton, who was blind, dictated his epic poem Paradise Lost to amanuenses, including his daughters.

I’m coming for you, humans.

A vizier obviously has more knowledge than the king. But it doesn’t make him more capable than the king. The vizier helps, but the king makes the call. Just like AI is more potent than a human, but it doesn’t make it the main element.

So I replied to her texts with this:

Sunny Dhondkar

Nah, I’m just kidding.

Jarvis (Just A Rather Very Intelligent System) is an artificial intelligence that assists Tony Stark (Iron Man) with a wide range of tasks, from managing his suits to offering tactical advice. Jarvis represents advanced technology, providing efficient, data-driven assistance without emotional nuance.

Let’s make things even more meta.

ChatGPT is like Dr. Watson to Sherlock Holmes. Alfred to Batman. There’s even a software called Alfred for Mac systems. I personally use it. There’s a reason why it was named Alfred. It proves that in this modern world, you don’t need to be a billionaire like Bruce Wayne to have your personal butler.

Well… No.

Tony Stark (Iron Man) has an AI moderator: Jarvis.

This analogy summarizes my point best:

So, basically, for her to win the debate competition, she would need to prove that AI (tools like ChatGPT) does not hinder the art of creative thinking in humans.

There’s an effective way to trap the opponents—by using our attacking argument as the defending argument—the symbiotic relationship we have with AI tools. Using the same attacking and defending argument will trap the opponents by rendering them off of any additional points to counter.

That’s by using AI to win the debate defending AI.

So the crazy little idea was to make the debate Meta.

Although, this level of comparison isn’t totally valid right now because what we are dealing with currently is Generative Artificial Intelligence and not Artificial General Intelligence. There’s way more to go for us to reach that level.

Hahaha.

Now, you’re about to experience a little heist we pulled.

Just like Alexander the Great being tutored by Aristotle.

Viziers:

What if this answer itself was written by ChatGPT? What if I trained ChatGPT on all of my Quora answers and taught it my language, tone, and way of writing?

Meta-Discussion = Discussion about Discussion

Alfred is Batman's butler, mentor, and moral compass. He provides emotional support, wisdom, and logistical help, acting as a human companion who ensures Bruce Wayne remains grounded. The relationship is deeply personal and rooted in trust and loyalty.

The thing is, ChatGPT existed in history—but in human form. People were creative back then because of a moderator in human form. Today, we don’t need a human moderator. Creativity will be maintained in the same way.

Now, concluding my answer to your question:

The legendary works published by writers throughout history were crafted with the help of assistants. It’s just that AI solves the problem of hiring human assistants. Now we can have our own assistants for free (or for tiny subscription, coz… capitalism).

Now it was up to her to perform well in the debate.

Post Credits:

Well, well, well.